Mark Evenson

My workarounds for not using `cl:step` when debugging: For debugging ABCL interactively under SLIME in lieu of STEP implementation, I visit code in a buffer, copy the relevant top-level forms...

From : Unfortunately, I can't replicate your original failure. After installing and loading issr-core from Quicklisp ``` (ql:quickload :issr-core) ``` The following forms seem to work just fine: ``` (defmethod...

I do have bookmarks in the hg clone of the svn repository, so pushing them to github/gitlab shouldn't be that hard with a little bit of experimentation.

Unfortunately, this breaks something in loading `osicat` (and perhaps others) as `cl:code-char` starts complaining about ``` The value * is not of type FIXNUM. ```

> I couldn't reproduce it. Indeed, my failure doesn't seem widespread. The failure with `ironclad` seems to be just occurring on Apple Silicon M1 (`"aarch64-Mac_OS_X-12.4`). ``` CL-USER> (lisp-implementation-version) "1.9.0" "OpenJDK_64-Bit_Server_VM-OpenJDK_Porters_Group-17.0.3+7"...

* ** TODO Ironclad failure Workaround: use SLIME to compile form directly by explicitly visiting file in interactive Emacs buffer then `M-x slime-compile-defun` (i.e. `C-c C-c` on the offending form).

Chicken and egg: such a probe should perhaps be defined for `javap` here, and then modified on the load of the `abcl-introspect` package.

``` STELLA 3.5.35 loaded. Type `(in-package "STELLA")' to execute STELLA commands.Making required system logic java.lang.VerifyError: (class: org/armedbear/lisp/pl_kernel_kb_2, method: signature: ()V) Bad type in putfield/putstatic at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredConstructors0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredConstructors(Class.java:2671) at...

> What is needed before this is ready for review / mergeable? What about being draft (does this even make sense given current state?) Does it reflect and capture all...

> Where's the content? I see nothing that relates to actual consensus mechanism. A base pseudo-code exposition of Glacier now exists. It needs editing, but is largely correct. Main problem...