easybuild-easyconfigs
easybuild-easyconfigs copied to clipboard
easybuilders
{devel}[system/system] ant v1.10.12
I did wonder whether this EB file should just be named ant-1.10.12.eb and not have any Java dependency since then there would be no need for ant-1.10.12-Java-17.eb?
I did wonder whether this EB file should just be named
ant-1.10.12.eband not have any Java dependency since then there would be no need forant-1.10.12-Java-17.eb?
I don't understand what you mean at all here. It does definitely depend on Java? and I see no connection as to how ant-1.10.12-Java-17.eb makes any difference one way or another.
What I meant is that it does not depend upon a specific version of Java for installation (it's just a PackedBinary). If this module were just called ant-1.10.12.eb then the user could select the version of Java without the need for separate ant-1.10.12-Java-XX.eb modules.
Right, i see where you are coming from. The same applies to a lot of java apps. Skipping the dep means that
- it won't work for a user that just
module load ant, not terrible, something we've tried to avoid elsewhere - also means we can't do sanity checks of installs. E.g. had
antbeen introduced now, we've probably asked for a sanity_check_command forant -h
Benefit is not having to double up on these, though in practice, we'll likely just have everything Java-11 as much as possible, until we switch to having Java-17 as much as possible, so..
I'd like other maintainers opinion on this.
I know my users will grumble that that the 'software is broken' if no Java is loaded by ant. I am wondering if there is a solution using multideps.
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1
PR test command 'EB_PR=16034 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16034 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!
- exit code: 0
- output:
Submitted batch job 9037
Test results coming soon (I hope)...
- notification for comment with ID 1222726240 processed
Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).
Test report by @boegelbot SUCCESS Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total) cns3 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8 See https://gist.github.com/b3edee6c76a1eecb61c71cb52d07c6bf for a full test report.
Test report by @boegel SUCCESS Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total) node3107.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8 See https://gist.github.com/3ad730a96afd81c34e9357bbccc507d2 for a full test report.