easybuild-easyconfigs
easybuild-easyconfigs copied to clipboard
{lib}[foss/2021a] PyTorch-Ignite v0.4.9 w/ Python 3.9.5
(created using eb --new-pr
)
Test report by @jfgrimm SUCCESS Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total) node134.pri.viking.alces.network - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6138 CPU @ 2.00GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8 See https://gist.github.com/29fb18c71fcbfe875c8d8b4225bff045 for a full test report.
probably worth switching to
PythonPackage
since it's currently only a single extension?
actually, I prefer to always use PythonBundle
as it's easier to add extensions later on (which is bound to happen at some point).
do you know if there's any advantage of using PythonPackage
besides "consistency"?
@boegelbot: please test @ generoso
@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1
PR test command 'EB_PR=15491 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_15491 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh
' executed!
- exit code: 0
- output:
Submitted batch job 10093
Test results coming soon (I hope)...
- notification for comment with ID 1409967805 processed
Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).
Test report by @boegelbot SUCCESS Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total) cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8 See https://gist.github.com/710e4f5413a6d7ee5e8b52fcf713ab29 for a full test report.
Test report by @branfosj SUCCESS Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total) bear-pg0103u14a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6330 CPU @ 2.00GHz (icelake), 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A30, 520.61.05, Python 3.6.8 See https://gist.github.com/f5f9813fcb842a1c032865fa2c780a09 for a full test report.