[Question] Does the HTACCESS only works on primary directory?

[benyaminl]

Does the htaccess only works on primary directory? not recursive?

[zeigerpuppy]

Looking at the code, I think the answer is YES.

It doesn't seem to be recursive, in fact looks like explicitly denies subdirs.

This is a bit disappointing as it would be good to have apache-like subdir support (maybe with an optional parameter for depth of search into subdirs).

For my use case, subdirs would be required.

I think it could be fixed but would need a bit of work.

(p.s. I have not tested, just browsed the code)

[benyaminl]

Looking at the code, I think the answer is YES.

It doesn't seem to be recursive, in fact looks like explicitly denies subdirs.

This is a bit disappointing as it would be good to have apache-like subdir support (maybe with an optional parameter for depth of search into subdirs).

For my use case, subdirs would be required.

I think it could be fixed but would need a bit of work.

(p.s. I have not tested, just browsed the code)

I see. I think it's a compromise between fast and compatibility with htaccess

Thanks for answering. I just want to clear my doubt. When look into the code, I also think same thing, just not sure.

[e404]

The script does in fact process subdirectories. You can also make incremental changes in subdirectories, overriding directives from parent directories, just like in Apache's implementation.

[zeigerpuppy]

thanks for the clarification @e404