dzmitry-lahoda
dzmitry-lahoda
Did quick tests on `schemars` # TLDR For same named items schemars generates second declaration/definition under +1 suffixed name. # Long: See `#/definitions/A2` > thread 'engine::tests::borsh_diff::serde_name_conflict' panicked at engine/src/engine/tests/borsh_diff.rs:68:5: RootSchema...
@frol @itegulov @miraclx @austinabell would PR which does exact same bump of number suffix in declaration accepted as fix as in schemars? # solution So for type `A` and `A`...
what is status for this?
may 20 first? :)
Workaround ``` try { Expand-Archive -Path $unpacked -DestinationPath "$($FOOBAR_RUNTIME)$($runtimeFolder)/" -Force } catch { tar -xkf $unpacked -C "$($FOOBAR_RUNTIME)$($runtimeFolder)/" } ```
Does not work for https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33401244/the-win32-internal-error-the-handle-is-invalid-0x6-occurred-while-getting-the
I run from `cmder` and `vscode` consoles on client, not sure if it is relevant
Probably archive should be big enough to repro.
too low level about implementation about pools to tbh
you specifying that there is pool.with xyk. why not making swap to be buy or sell messages. we do not care what inside. as long limits satisfied, protocol is correct....