dwave-examples
Some examples are duplicated
E.g. https://github.com/dwave-examples/graph-partitioning and https://github.com/dwave-examples/graph-partitioning-dqm
@vgoliber suggested making one more academic and one more application
I had hoped it would be useful to have a contrast between the classic formulation and the DQM formulation - hence the "duplication".
Sure, but how does a user know which one to access? We at the least need to be able to explain what each one is for, which touches on #9 .
We would absolutely keep the DQM formulation, it's just framing it as an application. In each of the README's we could mention the other formulation.
For example:
Academic repo: "For an example of how this academic problem can be used to build real-world applications, see..."
Application repo: "For a full explanation of the underlying academic problem, see..."
ah. I had seen mention of a "DQM" tag. Yes, understood. I am actually hoping that we get more problems submitted as DQM (like TSP, etc.) I think what you're getting at is improving the organization of them.
TSP is currently in the works: both BQM and DQM in a single repo. Joint project with Alex K and Cathy.
