Vitaly Drogan

Thanks for response, I'll try to create PR with benchmarks at least, since I already done them in our project.

Thanks for the response and a picture! I think I understand now. It looks like ecfg's "cfg node splitting algorithm" differs from what I used. Basically, on the first linear...

Hi @cwhinfrey - thanks for the explanation, here are some tests that we did and we are sure that problems that we have is not connected to zkSync. What I...

> As a feature request, we would love to support signature verification without deploying the contract. Great! We are implementing this feature right now. Here how it would work: You...

Ok, great that you reported it now, since we did not upgrade our contracts yet.

I don't have sample request response, because it depends on particular private key and I think it easy to generate sample request response, since "personal_sign" works as expected. (and they...

> This would be awesome, but it's impossible, either the private key is published and anybody can waste its 0 nonce on an unimportant transaction, or all possible future transactions...

yes, this is one of the pitfalls to be aware of when using builder address to receive funds

Builder uses blacklist for validation and building. so if you set "--builder.blacklist value" it will be used by the builder (`miner` module) and it will exclude that txs.

@goodjius . I was struggling with the same issue but exact advice from the changelog did not help, also I did not find example of the transaction for sqlite. Here...