Dusty Mabe
Dusty Mabe
> OK, though this is a developer-only focused change right now to be clear. Right. It's definitely not end user facing (hopefully), but it does have implications on our overall...
Converted back to draft. Let's hold this while we discuss with the podman folks more.
Should we close this?
Maybe instead of doing this we should pursue https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/pull/2067
> There's good discussion on that PR about whether it makes sense to have it run on every test since some tests may purposely invoke errors. I'm inclined to keep...
Note that this test essentially becomes a catchall for any SELinux issue that happens by default on boot. I think that's fine, but the test name and description are probably...
ok rebased and also added a test. The test depends on https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/pull/2683
rebased on top of latest tip - can we revisit this and get it in soon?
> Consider moving the check into a separate CI job which isn't marked required. Since the results of the build are essentially thrown away (not used) I'm wondering how we...
> @cgwalters > (You're right that it'd make sense too on the "using" page for sure) Yeah. I agree this would probably be best on the "using" page, but... >...