Dusty Mabe
Dusty Mabe
ok #458 has been fixed. @rtnpro, you should be able to add the support to undeploy() in openshift now
There a few outstanding items in the PR: https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp/pull/456#issuecomment-171872694
Removing blocker label as the required change would be too risky for GA and is not worth it.
we will be adding some tooling around "removing" containers sometime soon as part of https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp/pull/308 .. Let's revisit after we have the full lifecyle in place.. We may decide that...
@cdrage this is also #319
Ok let's get it in for GA then
Removing the blocker label from this. We won't be doing this before GA for several reasons. - #456 is a risky change that is a "nice to have" - There...
So one thing about this is that we are planning to make other steps in the future (see https://github.com/dustymabe/atomicapp/commit/bacf8ac3eb0fdee7462199887bec3b5f74411312). I think the action of removing the containers would be part...
@rtnpro I'd say for now let's concentrate on beta3 testing/bugfix and revisit this subject next week. Sound reasonable?
talked with rtnpro today. we agreed that this should/could be handled by another command rather than stop.