rusk
rusk copied to clipboard
Investigate fixed fee viability
Summary
It might be viable to (re)introduce a fixed fee for simple transfers, for both better user experience and client-side note proliferation mitigation.
Possible solution design or implementation
A fixed fee is fairly easy to introduce, especially given the atomicity of transactions. Care should be taken to not re-introduce transaction re-execution into execute state transition (EST).
Additional context
But I still believe that having a fixed fee for transfer would be a benefit for the network. Does it worth to reintroduce it? Originally posted by @herr-seppia in https://github.com/dusk-network/rusk/pull/1125#pullrequestreview-1765416838
@ureeves @ZER0 @herr-seppia @miloszm Is this still relevant? Do we need to discuss this?