rusk icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
rusk copied to clipboard

Investigate fixed fee viability

Open ureeves opened this issue 1 year ago • 1 comments

Summary

It might be viable to (re)introduce a fixed fee for simple transfers, for both better user experience and client-side note proliferation mitigation.

Possible solution design or implementation

A fixed fee is fairly easy to introduce, especially given the atomicity of transactions. Care should be taken to not re-introduce transaction re-execution into execute state transition (EST).

Additional context

But I still believe that having a fixed fee for transfer would be a benefit for the network. Does it worth to reintroduce it? Originally posted by @herr-seppia in https://github.com/dusk-network/rusk/pull/1125#pullrequestreview-1765416838

ureeves avatar Dec 05 '23 15:12 ureeves

@ureeves @ZER0 @herr-seppia @miloszm Is this still relevant? Do we need to discuss this?

HDauven avatar Apr 10 '24 15:04 HDauven