Paul J. Durack

@xylar @matthew-mizielinski thanks for getting into the weeds with this. We do capture the CV, DREQ and CMOR versions in the release comment (see [here](https://github.com/PCMDI/cmip6-cmor-tables/releases)), but importantly, a new version...

The path that a new modeling group is meant to follow, to use CMOR 1. register their institution and model in the CVs (institution_id and source_id) 2. this information is...

@xylar there has been no need to (up until now), and our versioning tag doesn't account for the CV version, however, the tag/release comment does

@xylar a practical question from me, do you expect folks to run `conda update` on their env every time they go to use it?

@chengzhuzhang yeah exactly, so when we updated `E3SM1-0` to include the `UCI` institution_id, if you had cloned the repo after this was merged (and pulled across into the `cmip6-cmor-tables` repo)...

@chengzhuzhang, let's pause for a second and let me chat with @taylor13, @matthew-mizielinski and @mauzey1 to figure out if a conda package makes sense. To be honest, I like the...

@xylar either way, adding a license is a trivial step, would CC BY-SA 4.0 cause you any issues in conda-forge land?

@mauzey1 just FYI, @matthew-mizielinski was planning on adding some html to this repo - it would be great if you can review to ensure that we're not messing anything up,...

@matthew-mizielinski just an FYI, we hadn't planned to turn on github pages on this repo - I wonder whether CMIP6_CVs (which does have github pages active) would be a better...

@mauzey1 I might hold off with that. @matthew-mizielinski would it be better for all new activity to occur under the [mip-cmor-tables repo](https://github.com/PCMDI/mip-cmor-tables/), including the "origin" tables?