Christian Folini
Christian Folini
No it's not. > Removing the v4. Milestone label since we decided in March that we won't be able to do this for v4. Very bitter decision.
@fzipi did you mean "Should we do the same for `ping`"? I'm puzzled. And if it's a **no**, then we can close this. Correct?
There is a lot of discussion around this and I see some need to move these tests. I am not entirely sure I get which tests. Could you indentify them...
OK, so let's leave this for now.
Our own quantiative testing lists 942200 PL2 as a problematic rule too, but it's not one of the worst offenders. So we'll probably accept it as is for CRSv4 and...
I agree. There is nothing wrong with release CRSv4 without this functionality. If there is a pressing need somebody will write a plugin from scratch, or people use something that...
942131 is a PL2 rule. FPs are unfortunate, but they have to be expected at PL2 and dealt with accordingly. I also see little interest or initiative to create a...
Can you get this expertise? Otherwise we're stuck. I'm not able to take this on.
@airween, could you review, please. (While being at it, I also rearranged some rule ID orders.)
Thanks @RedXanadu. Apparently, it did.