dumblob

@arguiot did you find some time to look at the implementation? Even if it's a stub - could you publish it?

Maybe some parallelization could leverage the Colab HW better?

I am still interested in this - maybe remove the stale bot here?

I can see `IANA review state: IANA OK - Actions Needed` in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-ip/?include_text=1 Can we do something to speed things up a bit around implementing support for IPs in ACME?

@tdelmas thanks for the pointer. So the certificate policy for IPs seems to be there. That's always good news. Do you happen to know whether there is any (preliminary/subject_to_change) schedule...

>We also don't have any specific timeline for implementing support for acme-ip, although it is likely it will happen sometime this year. Ok, didn't expect there is no plan currently....

In my news channel I just saw a reference to a paper with a simpler SSA algorithm than the widely-known one with just about the same performance characteristic: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-37051-9_6 ....

> Keeping the current floating point numbers would help with passerine's compatibility with other languages. It is the option with minimal controversy and with the most library support already. I...

Thanks for the comprehensive write up @ShawSumma and @slightknack! Sorry for reacting so late (tomorrow I'm leaving for another country with a very dense schedule until at least the end...

I think that sounds good to me *for now* :wink:. Just one nit pick: >The added caveat that a raw float literal is binary floating point by default (I say...