Eduardo Dantas
Eduardo Dantas
Thanks for your contribution. Here's the client: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1axpKG8b-gE3HRN1xwez6D_K3SKWlN-9p/view?usp=drive_link
Thank you all for the comments and contributions on this PR. I’m closing it in favor of PR #3794, which follows the project’s standards and covers this change more comprehensively....
This PR is a solid contribution; thank you for the improvements here. The refactor makes the code more consistent, with clearer variable names, and the use of `std::invocable` provides a...
Thanks for the contribution, but this PR needs more context before it can be properly reviewed. The pull request does not follow the project’s PR template and does not explain...
@libergod I've asked for the codex to create a "model" for you to understand better this, look: https://github.com/opentibiabr/canary/pull/3691 I don't have the intention to merge this; it's only one "example."...
> Hi, Yes, will look at it today and try to implement/test. I am so sorry, I don't understand half of those rules, but I am willing to learn. Thanks...
There are a few adjustments that need to be made, so I've opened a new PR with you as a co-author. Please test it and give me feedback so I...
Opened new PR: https://github.com/opentibiabr/canary/pull/3829