Jon Duckworth

This is a slight variation on the original question, but I wonder if it would make sense to move the backends to separate repos. Given that there are now a...

@philvarner I can tackle this. Just to be clear, the `rel` type of the link should be `http://www.opengis.net/def/rel/ogc/1.0/queryables`? So the link would look something like this? ```json { "rel": "http://www.opengis.net/def/rel/ogc/1.0/queryables",...

> correct. you could also add application/json as the type Wait, shouldn't this be `application/schema+json` per #400?

> I could see work done to generalize and implement a link injection mechanism so that other libraries can write hooks into the STAC objects returned by stac-fastapi so that...

I tried implementing `bump2version` in PySTAC as part of the upcoming release, but am blocked by c4urself/bump2version#235 in automating the changes to the CHANGELOG.

> since PySTAC is on **pytest** Actually, PySTAC is still running tests using `python -m unittest`, but I think we should move to `pytest` as well.

Originally, we had talked about supporting a variety of serialization and containerization formats. I originally intended the `type` field to be something like `"containerized"` or `"serialized"` and then the `format`...

Thanks @m-mohr , this is all really good feedback. I think I will break most of these out into separate issues so we can have more targeted discussions around them...

> > Are models "spatio-temporal assets"? (Would models be STAC Items ?) > That's the issue :-). You could think by virtue of being trained with images, which are obviously...

Moved the STAC Extension discussion to #30