Pierre Dubois

I know that the majority of the pages wont use it. So I am not a fan to bundle it with wet-boew. I am for it, if we can we...

There is some CMS that we can not add that one simple line of html. @LaurentGoderre what kind of conflict a CMS might have with that? CORS issue?

@cfarquharson The next step would be to look at the best way to add it. * Will be exclusive to GCWeb or not. * Do we add a "link" in...

@patlaj there is no need to open up a new issue for that on GCWeb. A PR with the code change, documentation and a description that answer to each aspect...

@MichaelDalrymple that is a feature you can develop during the Tuesday WET-BOEW codesprint. --- Additionally, to sort a table per date, I would assume the table would contain the proper...

> if anyone has ever created buttons that would go with a filterable data That is already available for GCWeb theme since the v4.0.26 release. Take a look at the...

> I should have guessed that someone would have done this already. The addition of that feature was made possible by the contribution of IRCC department. > use these tables...

@smlum what are you trying to do exactly? Do you want to add a new feature into wet-boew or you want to create an extension (in a separate JS file)...

TODO: Check if we can rely on the HTML native require attribute instead of the custom one from the form validation. Let check if we can fix the following, like...

We will need to describe the use case, what is the problematic to the user, how we can test, what is the current result, what is the expected result. What...