Dave Thaler

This issue isn't specific to relref. If relref is changed to xref, the same issue still occurs.

In RST, links look like this: ``` `RFC 8126 section 4 `_ ``` What should this look like in XML? From my reading of https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-iab-rfc7991bis-04.html#element.xref, is the following the right...

I agree with wontfix but this example came from someone else who may feel more strongly.

> I don't think handling function calls as macros at the CFG level is the right approach, and I do not believe Arie and @caballa supported this approach. This is...

Code coverage failure seems to be a transient failure due to coveralls backend, not specific to this PR.