David Tchepak
David Tchepak
Thanks @ThomasBleijendaal . I'm spiking out a way to support more flexible arg matching at the moment. I'll will try to ensure it meets this use case. I'll ping you...
PR: https://github.com/nsubstitute/NSubstitute/pull/912
Thanks for this! > 1. Do we want to have dependabot with update proposals? cc @nsubstitute team What are the possible impacts to users here? Not sure if any of...
> if you are worried around certain packages needing to be pinned to a specific version, I'm less worried about packages NSub uses, and more about requirements that projects that...
> Okay, what is the final decision? For now we don't want to have dependabot, right? @Romfos I'm happy to go with whatever you recommend here. We don't need to...
I really like that this is self-contained without changing other NSubstitute fundamentals. Rather than a specific substitute target, could potentially try to get it working across multiple subs like `Received.InOrder`:...
Had a quick look at this but haven't come up with a good answer sorry. :( Not sure if it is possible, but maybe look at running the expectation building...
Thanks for raising this @aukevin ! @304NotModified I had a go at fixing this: https://github.com/nsubstitute/NSubstitute/pull/886
This should be fixed now @aukevin . Thanks for the report! Please let me know if you find more issues with this 🙇
Hi @voroninp , Thanks for raising this. I've transferred it to the Analyzers project which is detecting [NS3005](https://github.com/nsubstitute/NSubstitute.Analyzers/blob/dev/documentation/rules/NS3005.md). cc: @tpodolak