Don Syme
Don Syme
This isn't necessarily a totally bad idea, but it brings "inline" to be closer to macro expansion, which means, for example, that these specific inline functions must actually be applied...
I agree this should be addressed. There are a number of these things that work only for members and not for `let` or vice-versa.
For me it feels that this warning still has a role to play. For beginners, disposability can all to easily be ignored.
Yes, I'm open to discussing this. One problem is that in F# 1.0 we followed C# in allowing default struct initializers for all structs defined using class syntax: ```fsharp []...
Linking https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-10.0/parameterless-struct-constructors.md
I've marked this as approved in principle - I think we should do parameterless struct constructors in some form too.
> Or is that meant to be solely executed if the parameterless constructor is called explicitly? Yes, this.
> Part 1 - Compiler emitting specialized ToString for records and unions, I'm ok with approving this though compat may be very tricky. I don't think it needs an RFC....
> Can you please elaborate on this? I somewhat naively thought the only tricky part would be preserving the same indentation. The problem is that in theory the recursive structural...
> Hopefully some shortcuts that result in cleaner code will be allowed, but we probably would need some degree of going into object graphs. I believe none of the string...