Donald Stufft
Donald Stufft
> NO compilation acceptable I think this more or less kills the idea as a mandatory thing. Maybe an opt-in thing.
It doesn't bother me, but it'd be a non-optional dependency on setuptools for requests, unless you also handled the "doesn't have setuptools case" as a fall back to the current...
Only at build time.
This is probably going to end up having a lot of overlap with django.contrib.postgres I'd think? https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mjtamlyn/improved-postgresql-support-in-django
What does: > remove all python3 compatibility bits Mean? That's not gunicorn dropping support for Python 3.x is it?
So, does that mean dropping support for Python 2.x then? :)
Cool. Thanks!
I would prefer it if clients did not purge PyPI itself. This should generally be treated as a bug in PyPI not something for bandersnatch to take care of.
Eh, I mean technically yes? My main concern with working around it in Bandersnatch is that we otherwise likely won’t even know it’s broken if Bandersnatch is just “fixing” It...
My suggestions here: Write out 3 files `index.html`, `index.v1_html`, and `index.v1_json`. These will map to: | Ext | Content Type | | --- | --------------- | | `.html` | `text/html`...