David Soria Parra
David Soria Parra
Hey, just read through the proposal again. Thank you for taking the time to work through this. Having thought more about this, I think there are two distinct problems here:...
@patwhite If you have the time, do you mind changing the proposal from using `@namespace` to a `namespace` field? If you have a take as to why we want namespaces...
Okay coming back to this. It's been a lengthy discussion. At the last MCP developer summit we brought up the idea of introducing a difference between a tool name and...
I still think this is an important feature, but we should implement this with the ability to specify custom request method names and not go only via `custom/request`
I am wondering if we want a notification to represent partial results or a general streaming mechansim. In my mind, notifications would imply that they can be ignored on client...
Thank you for the repro. That is very useful. That is helpful. I'll take a look. Can't promise any dates.
I add a PR. With PR a server continues to respond in inspector after the timeouts. I have to yet test with Claude Desktop.
Are the SDK authors fine with maintaining such a spec?
> Yeah, this is all over the tech Internet today. It appears to be a way to formalize tool-use for Anthropic models. I think I'm some distance away from adding...
I think I understand the proposal and the use cases. When we designed MCP we deliberately used resources for potential RAG applications to ensure that the context is not leaked...