David Bold

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-xbout/blob/rawhide/f/python-xbout.spec#_13 This was done with #278 #283 #291

Would that not still be pulled in (and than provide a top-level package)? https://github.com/boutproject/xBOUT/blob/master/setup.cfg#L41

> Is it worth adding a method to `BoutDataset` so that if a dataset has FCI geometry it's possible to get a plot from a one-line call, something like `ds.bout.poincare_plot()`?...

Oh sorry, I misread. I thought you wanted to only add the method if it is an fci dataset. Concerning git-lfs, I do not like the github one, they have...

Still missing: - [ ] tests - [ ] dataset accessor

I think that would make most of the pluggins work unnecessary :tada: Do we want to say "SI" - or are we happy with eV as temperature? All I would...

Note that including boutcore could cause that it needs to be (L)GPL ...

Sorry, should correct that. It doesn't need to be (L)GPL, but it needs to be compatible with GPL, if we want to provide a close coupling between boutcore and xbout,...

According to [this](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses) and [this](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#apache2) ASL-2.0 is compatible with GPL v3. I think GPL is great because it ensures not only that xBOUT itself is and stays free software, but...

Seems it might be easier to use `boutcore` :-)