David Saff

Can you describe in a little more detail what needs to happen in the initialization step? As mentioned in #430, the core of JUnit has not yet enabled any features...

I'm understanding some of the motivation here, but in order to explore solutions, can you go into details about your specific situation? What needs to happen during the setup? Is...

I can guess this wouldn't be your preferred solution, but for my information, could you achieve your goals with a @Rule in each test class?

The trade-off is that, while it is "noise free", it is also "signal free". I can no longer look at a test case and know everything that's going on--I also...

I don't often hear feedback from users that want zero lines of configuration vs. one line. At this point, I'm really not inclined to introduce a feature that will encourage...

I can understand wanting to add some kind of listeners at runtime. Can you help me understand a little more about how spock works on top of JUnit? Right now,...

There's a pretty hard architectural problem here: JUnit promises runners like Eclipse that it can enumerate how many tests there are before any of the tests are run, but also...

@javornikolov, I just realized that I misread your initial post, and so my response was likely confusing. I was reading your test as two different instantiations of a test class...

We made an early decision that it should not be possible to ever get a reference to a Runner object that couldn't be validly configured. So if a Runner won't...

Can you do the validation you want in the RunnerBuilder, or in the setter? I know that there are several categories of things that the current implementation makes difficult, and...