David Wells

Good point - I'll see if any examples run differently with this change.

No - I should try this again when I have time. I think its OK. We have better test coverage now too which should help make it easier to figure...

No, I didn't check it out. I'll try to get this done before the release.

Can they set up stuff that will run at UNC or as GitHub actions?

Infrastructure week is done. Some accomplishments: 1. A day-long debugging session fixed our zlib problems in autoibamr - I made the same changes in IBAMR proper. autoibamr now works on...

I took this approach when writing the deal.II bindings: https://github.com/drwells/fiddle/blob/master/include/fiddle/mechanics/part.h But, in retrospect - this involves completely rewriting FEMechanicsBase for not a lot of gain. It would improve the code...

By 'both APIs', do you mean the new deal.II one and the current libMesh one? If so, absolutely - we should maintain the libMesh API indefinitely, just not massively rewrite...

Ah. Maybe? That's going to be harder to do since libMesh has such a fundamentally different set of features. Lets reopen this for now.

Yes. Several things are still missing (like body forces and pressures) but we now enforce that the same FE space is used for displacement, velocity, and force. However, the deal.II...

Most of these MATLAB scripts are very straightforward. I would prefer to just translate these to C++ so that they can be integrated into the build system without worrying about...