Erik Wilde

On 2020-12-13 15:28, Michael L. Nelson wrote: > It would seem to me that the Sunset: header would combine nicely with > Link: rel="memento" ... > If "this" URI will...

here's a starting point, feedback and comments greatly appreciated: the concept model should be very fuzzy, basically only requiring _a title_, a _unique identifier_ for each concept, and then allowing...

hello graham. On 2016-03-10 15:00, gklyne wrote: > I believe there was a proposal to map registered registered link > relations into URI space in a consistent fashion, but don't...

going through your comments one by one... On 2016-03-10 15:00, gklyne wrote: > ``` > 6.8. Runtime vs. Design-Time > ``` > > I'm not aware of any IANA registries...

On 2016-03-10 10:00, gklyne wrote: > Catching up... same here... ;-) and maybe we can do so in person later this week. > I think there's an important registry operation...

> I think the draft is a bit schizo about the specific use of IANA > registries. There are many references to IANA registries, but much of > the language...

just wondering here, @gklyne: would that issue be addressed by talking about various "categories" of values that a registry might have? this could be associated with different levels of review/process...

On 2017-08-01 13:49, gklyne wrote: > That (.. various "categories" of values ..) is effectively what happens > now for URI scheme registration: the requirement for provisional > registration is...

@jcurranz, i think i understand your concern. but this really is about the semantics of registry contents, right? in this case it's a special kind of semantics because it is...

> The IETF has had occasions where other parties (e.g. another standard > body) just said "just give us a entry in that registry, and we'll define > what it...