Eric Hodel
Eric Hodel
It's a clever workaround and is officially unsupported.
Reading the DBM documentation, this will take more work on the RDoc side than I anticipated, but not much: > #### Cautions > > Before you decide to use DBM,...
I think this idea will work: 1. Package individual ruby version specific gems for ri data that the master rdoc-data gem knows how to find and install. 2. The version-specific...
I approve this idea. I think the directive should be only a version. This would allow RDoc to have a page listing all the methods and their date of introduction....
Not enough time for this in RDoc 4.1, moving to the next release.
Yes, I have had a difficult time getting around to fixing this. I've updated the title to make the issue more clear.
RDoc could learn `define_method` but `if false` is beyond RDoc's capability.
To add some extra notes: `link:` is currently not portable. It will not generate the correct link cross-platform. `rdoc-ref:` works with `--root` and `--page-dir` but looks ugly to read. `link:`...
If you're concerned about your "documentation coverage" number, don't be. It's purely for amusement purposes, especially when you have self-documenting constants like this. What documentation would you like to see...