JonP

Oh I think I misinterpreted your question. I'd change the syntax so that the names are inside of comments, not keep the current syntax.

Yeah, the names would only be used for doccords.

I think I see what you're getting at. If its only used for doccords, it makes sense to make it part of the comments. Making it part of the syntax...

Per the last sync, we're just going to punt on this issue and I'll utilize the one-line descriptions of cores as their "names" for the printing library in the meantime,...

It does not. I have thought that making doccords printing part of the `?` circus is the most likely place for it to end up though, since you often want...

@joemfb pointed out that the syntax `foo:chapter:core:lib` is confusing since it looks like several uses of the irregular form of `=

This is working now, but I still need to write unit tests for them.

Not worth addressing edge cases until #5770 is resolved

#5849 needs to be fixed in a separate OTA that goes out before doccords release.

Current branch for `::` syntax changes: https://github.com/urbit/urbit/tree/jon/doccords-parser-simplify - pardon the unhelpful commit messages, I'm planning on squashing them all into one when merging back into this branch. It's cooled down...