Darren Loher

icon indicating an email [email protected]

icon company @Google icon location San Diego, CA USA icon location I’m interested in software for packet and optical networks

Results 810 comments of Darren Loher

Updates to network instance models for VLAN-VNI and VRF-VNI mappings

/gcbrun

Updates to network instance models for VLAN-VNI and VRF-VNI mappings

/gcbrun

Updates to network-instance EVPN models for EVPN redist support

Hi @abamberger-arista, the state tree doesn't match this PR? Where is `vni-list`?

Support for ACL with netmask set with non-contiguous bits

Hi, this is possible to address. However, you will need to show evidence that multiple NOS implementations support this capability in your PR

Augmented attributes interface-ref, payload-type and metric fields to mpls-static lsp

[JunOS static-label-switched-path](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/cli-reference/topics/ref/statement/static-label-switched-path-edit-protocols-mpls.html) supports options for setting the next hop as an interface, and setting metric. There is no support for payload-type. [Cisco XROS static lsp configuration](https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/iosxr/cisco8000/mpls/79x/b-mpls-cg-cisco8000-79x/implementing-mpls-static-labeling.html#concept_djw_cml_pkb) supports interface as next...

Augmented attributes interface-ref, payload-type and metric fields to mpls-static lsp

@Shashank-arista ping for any comments, especially regarding payload type.

Augmented attributes interface-ref, payload-type and metric fields to mpls-static lsp

/gcbrun

Augmented attributes interface-ref, payload-type and metric fields to mpls-static lsp

> > @Shashank-arista ping for any comments, especially regarding payload type. > > Hi @dplore, Sorry for the delay in getting back on this. I tried to investigate more on...

Augmented attributes interface-ref, payload-type and metric fields to mpls-static lsp

/gcbrun

Request for support to filter any type of protocol in a ACL entry

Hi, can you provide some examples of ACL rules which use an IP protocol == ANY? We are wondering if ANY is implicit when, for example, defining an ACL entry...