Daniel P H Fox

Yeah this is the sort of thing I'm thinking about. We could do both perhaps, no reason not to. This perhaps could inform the reactive tag APIs in #206

[Both? Both. Both. Both is good.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSCGoefBO7Q) But we'll divvy it up a bit; if we're adding `Tags`, we should probably consider whether there are reasonable interpretations of `Attributes`, `Properties`, `Events`,...

Merging with #87

To elaborate on my thoughts around this idea: I think that you can absolutely abuse this to write code that's less easy to read, or chase needless performance gains that...

Superseded by #205

Waiting for #206 to see how we should implement this.

Unblocking this. We won't need double parent assignment - that should be impossible now - but it's still possible to attempt to parent one child into two places. I'm not...

I will focus this feature request on child names. Pattern matching will not be considered, at least for the first iteration of this feature.

Perhaps the best play here is to implement a new special key which accepts the props and does the selection automatically, requiring no retconning of the Children special key to...

#206 sounds appropriate for that use case.