Article "Development workflow for Docker apps" could use some proofreading

[reinux]

Thanks for writing this article.

This is a rather complicated topic with a lot of moving parts, so the article could do with some proofreading to help reduce cognitive overhead. Even just improving punctuation would be helpful.

---

Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

• ID: 1b69a4b5-2003-e7a5-97a3-59e3737ea1ef
• Version Independent ID: c8fefbe8-6f9b-209a-3563-2cb51384707c
• Content: Development workflow for Docker apps
• Content Source: docs/architecture/microservices/docker-application-development-process/docker-app-development-workflow.md
• Product: dotnet-architecture
• Technology: microservices
• GitHub Login: @nishanil
• Microsoft Alias: nanil

[erjain]

Hi @reinux, Thanks for the suggestions. We will try to improve our documentation in future releases. Meanwhile, it will be great if you can share some excerpts.

[erjain]

We are working on improvements to the microservices eBook and estimated the same in our dotnet-architecture projects. The issue can be closed.

[IEvangelist]

Closed per @erjain

[reinux]

Sorry I missed this, @erjain . Thanks and looking forward to the new docs!