Gerhard Dorn

Results 25 comments of Gerhard Dorn

A benchmark results for the new implementation using ``intersectparameters`` (CrossingSegments) is better than the solution inspired by Balbes, R. and Siegel, J. 1990. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0167839691900198) ![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67096719/195908776-a3a46c85-69d9-40a2-9b87-5dbe94fcae2a.png) In addition intersectcollinear was wrong...

> @dorn-gerhard various tests are failing. This is a central key algorithm that we need to be extra careful to change. Can you please double check what is happening? Sure,...

I see the problem and investigated the issue deeper. A test in ``polytopes.jl`` fails, namely a ``issimiple(p::PolyArea)`` test which calls ``issimple(p.outer::Chain)`` in ``chains.jl`` which uses intersection of Segments and basically...

I will need a bit of time to work on the test cases, intersectiontypes for 2d are missing, i can provide the 5 test cases and the 8 subcases for...

I added a bunch of test cases for 2D with special focus on colinear case, including tests on IntersectionType ![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/67096719/198707523-cbd0e06f-264a-43e5-b968-bb2bb1b57c0c.png) I didn't touch the old 2D test cases, of which...

> oh in player setting change minimum installed android 33 , in Desember 2023 android not allowed android 32 lower > > ![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/157174500/302043829-cecc161c-5af1-4f6e-9c67-a62632d837de.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MTEzMjA4NTUsIm5iZiI6MTcxMTMyMDU1NSwicGF0aCI6Ii8xNTcxNzQ1MDAvMzAyMDQzODI5LWNlY2MxNjFjLTVhZjEtNGY2ZS05YzY3LWE2MjYzMmQ4MzdkZS5wbmc_WC1BbXotQWxnb3JpdGhtPUFXUzQtSE1BQy1TSEEyNTYmWC1BbXotQ3JlZGVudGlhbD1BS0lBVkNPRFlMU0E1M1BRSzRaQSUyRjIwMjQwMzI0JTJGdXMtZWFzdC0xJTJGczMlMkZhd3M0X3JlcXVlc3QmWC1BbXotRGF0ZT0yMDI0MDMyNFQyMjQ5MTVaJlgtQW16LUV4cGlyZXM9MzAwJlgtQW16LVNpZ25hdHVyZT02MzFiNzkyZjhkNjEzMDcxOTY4NWExMTcyOGIyZDdjZjJkMDBmZmM5MzczZGZlOGMxMWI5NmNkMTUzYzhmZTRlJlgtQW16LVNpZ25lZEhlYWRlcnM9aG9zdCZhY3Rvcl9pZD0wJmtleV9pZD0wJnJlcG9faWQ9MCJ9.sTXy0Z1VqyWKbv358ywc8etBcG2uTJ6zZwyRxfrUCFA) I experienced the same problem (as stated...

I just read a post on Zulip about using a module defined in a cell in Pluto. This also shows a strange behaviour: as one has to rerun the ``using...

We could replace ``using .MyModule`` by a Macro ``` julia macro using_local_modules(MyModule) return :(eval(Meta.parse(join(string.(names($MyModule)[2:end]), ", ") * " = " * split(string($MyModule), ".")[end] * "." * join(string.(names($MyModule)[2:end]), ", "*split(string($MyModule), ".")[end]...

After finishing intersections between ``rays``, ``lines`` and ``segments``, I will work on intersections of these three geometries with ``plane`` and ``triangles``. Therefore I will think about a new (more general)...

thank you for the hint - you are right, [email protected] triggers the following error: ``` julia ERROR: WARNING: Error while freeing DeviceBuffer(400 bytes at 0x0000000205200a00): CUDA.CuError(code=CUDA.cudaError_enum(0x000002bc), details=CUDA.Optional{String}(data=nothing)) Stacktrace: [1] throw_api_error(res::CUDA.cudaError_enum)...