Dorgan

Hi @msaraiva! I'm glad to see that Sourceror is being of use for the community. > I wonder if you still have plans on that regard and how do you...

@NickNeck I'm still reviewing `recode`, as I didn't have the change to do it before I think at least `Recode.AST` and `Recode.Traverse` are excellent candidates to be ported to Sourceror....

@NickNeck Awesome, thank you so much :) @zachdaniel the issue is that we need the formatter to produce proper string from a piece of AST, but we can't just assume...

I just rebuilt the vsix file and published it, with no changes other than [bumping the engine version](https://github.com/doorgan/beamdasm/commit/066e09de377230af31858fb13aee02fa23de20fd#diff-7ae45ad102eab3b6d7e7896acd08c427a9b25b346470d7bc6507b6481575d519L9) which wasn't even required, and it now works I published the fork...

Yup, this is a bug, I'm working on a fix :)

v0.11 is out with a fix, please let me know if you're still experiencing this issue

This would be a welcome change! I'd make the following changes though: - `is_local_call` should be named `is_unqualified_call`, as local or non-local is a runtime property and not necessarily a...

I see, though wouldn't the addition of `has_range?` need a refactor regardless? For a bunch of nodes we need to recursively check the contents to calculate the range(if possible), so...

Sounds good!

Re: the `Access` work, that will be built on existing sourceror primitives unless some optimization is required, so it's not something to worry about :)