Donald Sharp

I put this in do not merge mode because I wanted the original author to take a look at it and make sure things were right from their perspective. Once...

Removing do not merge and preliminary labels. This is good to go

tested this code locally and I am seeing significant savings in run time too. Let's get this in.

Once CI finishes I'll get this in

when does zebra receive a NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV6 for usage in 5549?

I was mainly asking to gauge whether or not I wanted to ask for a topotest. I don't mind treating both the same, I am trying to figure out what...

would it be possible to add a small topotest to show that this is working the way we want?

This does change the output of some commands. I am on the edge of this being of a sufficiently bad output that this fix is worth doing.

From my perspective I don't understand the need here. Can you give me a bit better understanding of why we need to distinguish this? I see no need here for...

I'm about 75% of the way through a fix for this problem. Can we hold off on this?