Dominik Picheta
Dominik Picheta
The utility is that it enables a standalone Nimble package to be installed, i.e. one without git metadata. We can make it optional though.
Not sure if it helps but you can also do `nimble c ...`
Please elaborate @FedericoCeratto ^^
Nah, this is different and worthy of discussion too. Especially in the context of how Nimble treats package structures. Also I'm not sure we've decided yet to leave things as-is,...
Yeah, I prefer `nimble deps`.
Sure, looks good. Can we also put the source code into its own module before merging?
I think keeping `depsTree` in there makes sense, Nimble should probably contain mostly procedures that take a `Options` object as input and then call out into different modules that implement...
> Adding [Solved] to a thread like this one: https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/6049 That's already solved differently: each thread has a `isSolved` field. We just need logic to mark a thread as being...
Because it discourages discussion. New threads are far more easily readable than bumping old threads constantly. It also depends on the ability to modify titles which right now isn't possible...
can you make a PR? :)