dodexahedron

> I don't think my plan as stated will work. gitversion is just not flexible enough. > > I will need to revert back to having `main` and `develop` branches...

> Didn't work but I found the culprit that was a the `Package Source Mapping` that was set has `* nuget`. Removing it resolved the issue. Thanks for your help....

> > Didn't work but I found the culprit that was a the `Package Source Mapping` that was set has `* nuget`. Removing it resolved the issue. Thanks for your...

Maybe a prompt with a suggested action (such as the action it would currently take), and a cancel, which aborts, returns things to how they were, and maybe event presents...

I'll flag this for follow-up. Right now, I'm working in Terminal.Gui stuff that is going to have enough impact over here that I'd rather not fix something that ends up...

> Check if is some TestFixture that is using a class on a parameter. With xunit that happens and doesn't run the test at all. Good thinking. But, nunit doesn't...

@tznind does a git blame on any particular commit result in better behavior? Also, it's possible that the runner may just need to be tweaked, if this is only happening...

As I've been working on these tests, I made some changes to the MenuTracker that improved static analysis without changing behavior, which then allowed minor improvements at the call sites...

Yeah there's a test for that last case you already wrote. 👍 As for disposal, no we don't really Dispose anything. V1 didn't even really have that for most things...

Oh and a place where not having a Disposing event has already come up (and one of the things that prompted raising the issue in the first place) was when...