Nenad Rakocevic

> p: none view [p: panel [do [? p]]] P is a none! value: none ;) pane doesn't know about `p:` yet You can use predefined `face` word to access...

So the actual use-case is being able to address one of the current parents panel face from within a nested reactive expression. I agree that it worth supporting. My default...

"Hard GC-related" in the title implies that the GC is causing corruption and crashes, while I don't see any proof of that in the description. It looks more like some...

Here is a comment about that from @hiiamboris: > When I see either $ or >> it tells me where this command belongs to (shell or console). Without it I...

`to` on `integer!`, `float!` and `tuple!` does not `load` the string, it does a very fast [scanning](https://github.com/red/red/blob/master/runtime/tokenizer.reds#L15) to convert a literal integer in string representation to an integer value (other...

> I think we can stick to the "consume just digits, error out if something else encountered" rule. Implemented. Only `'` character is now accepted (and skipped) by `to-integer`.

It is possible to change the object implementation to support such use-case (though, only for the interpreter, not sure it's doable for the compiler, probably not), but not easily in...

Additional implementation notes ---- After considering how the current implementation could be changed to "make SELF reactive", that would require removing the `on-set` field in the `red-object!` slot, which is...

> That is, first object's (o) initialization is simply unreliable! If I rely on on-change to enforce some state invariants for this object, they won't hold true. It works as...

Original reported case now supported as a side-effect of fixing several object events and `self` issues.