docs
docs copied to clipboard
Official image page shows unsupported architecture tags
The official image pages generated from this repository show clickable tag search links for platforms the image does not support. For example, for JRuby:
![Screen Shot 2022-03-31 at 10 43 25](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10135/161095904-c0d71c54-d820-4219-8b6b-0b1800f44c03.png)
I have been unable to find any way to customize this list, but we have had at least one bug report about unsupported platforms showing up in this tag list: https://github.com/jruby/docker-jruby/issues/78
It seems like this list should not include platforms that are not explicitly supported, but I am unsure how it is being generated.
To clarify... JRuby's official image does not, at the time of the above image, explicitly support ARM, 386, IBM Z, or PowerPC 64 LE, and in fact can't support them because the base OpenJDK image only supports am64 and arm64v8.
JRuby is adding explicit arm64v8 support in https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/12163 to address https://github.com/jruby/docker-jruby/issues/78.
We don't have direct control over those, but I'll ask some folks on the Hub team. :+1:
@tianon Thank you! It is confusing for me and for our users to have platforms listed there that we don't support.
The good news is that these don't show up on https://hub.docker.com/_/jruby anymore!
(The bad news is that they do still show up on https://hub.docker.com/search?q=jruby&image_filter=official :see_no_evil:)
Well, it's an improvement!
The good news is that these don't show up on https://hub.docker.com/_/jruby anymore!
(The bad news is that they do still show up on https://hub.docker.com/search?q=jruby&image_filter=official 🙈)
This seems to have improved because I don't see any architecture labels on these pages. Closing issue.
Good news, thanks! Less confusing for the users.