Dobromir Hristov

Please give a better explanation to your issue.

You want to validate whether an array has repeating items? If so, then a custom validator function would be best

If this is resolved, please close the ticket.

Sorry but that wont work ofc, $each can be used to validate properties on the objects in the array, but they should be there in the first place. For such...

I think we can make an extra package with various validators, so the base package is as clean as possible. This way it would be easier to contribute.

You could add a top level validator? ``` collection: { required, $each: { required } } ``` This way, the `collection` must include elements.

We use this regex to parse emails - https://emailregex.com/index.html From the looks of things, our regex is a bit outdated and on their website `[email protected]` is not valid. Using square...

Yeah, pushing things into the array, causes all validators to evaluate, thus causing those updates on the computed as the prop receives a new object. `$each` has a very complicated...

@shentao I looked into this and if the rules are defined as `computed` or `data` properties and passed to the `WithVuelidate` wrapped component, there is no recursion issue. But applied...

I think it's just a problem with applying a watcher to a reactive prop, defined in the template. I did something similar today, but with array.reverse in the template. Threw...