Daniel Nathan Gray

I've been having a look at this post today. Sorry for the delay. I made sure to read each post in sequence, and thus I made notes along the way....

Hi, @RemoveMyPhone-dev > Interestingly, we've also reviewed the Privacy Policies of other competitors in the industry (including some that actually sponsor PrivacyTools.io) and found them to be much more loose...

> Adding `WIP` tag - pausing until we can define some search criteria which would help clarify if this is acceptable or not for listing (based on their [privacy policy](https://metager.org/datenschutz)):...

All of the links you've presented are not relevant and haven't been for almost a decade or more. (2012) etc. It's also worth mentioning Linux mint's website has google adverts....

In the past we'd refrained from mentioning every ubuntu/debian derivative, as there are a lot of them. When we mention Ubuntu, we include any of Canonical's derivatives. (Kubuntu, Lubuntu, Xubuntu...

> I'll admit that I wasn't aware of that. However, since that's now resolved and the Ubuntu website uses Google Analytics, that no longer seems to be justification for not...

I would approve this if you think it's better than ToS;DR but, I don't use either. so.

I would have thought **Decentralized** would have been a better definition than "Nodal" which I've actually not seen anywhere in CS. Throwing Tor in there isn't strictly correct either and...

> Tbh when looking at the mentioned upsides/downsides of federated services and p2p applications I think session fits neither I'd still put it under Decentralized, (assuming we change Federated to...

I am thinking it might be best to have 3 categories, Centralized, Decentralized, and Distributed. Then talk about each application. The reason is because "peer-to-peer" brings its own issues in...