David Murphy

@OrangeDog I believe we are in a circular argument, the new name is to identify the SHA-256 version of the key, and to allow users to keep the old SHA-1...

So the old SHA-1 key was called SALTSTACK-GPG-KEY.pub, the SHA-256 key used in Salt 3005.1 for RHEL 9 and Ubuntu 22.04 was called SALTSTACK-GPG-KEY2.pub. But Salt is not SaltStack anymore,...

@lmf-mx The naming of the key merely reflects the year it was created, hopefully there will be no need for a new key in 2024. Noting the old SHA-1 key...

@lmf-mx The need for a single key was recognized, and that is why from Salt 3006.x on, there is only a single key. Fortunately the older OS's which could not...

I will bring a set of stakes to kill this completely, it is like a vampire raising up. :rofl: Wonders what the RedHat standard is ?

My thoughts are to clean up and do the https://repo.saltproject.io/salt/py3/ubuntu/22.04/amd64/salt-archive-keyring.pgp for Salt 3008 (as per @OrangeDog ), given 3008 will be ground changing with the salt extensions etc., and classic...

The Debian instructions https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository/UseThirdParty look like they need revision, since they are targeting Stretch (Debian 9 - EOL), and current is Bookworm (Debian 12) and mentions apt-key which is deprecated....

@bdrx312 Please retry the issue with the latest 3006.2, a number of fixes have been made since 3006.0 was released.

@bdrx312 Tried this with Salt 3005.1 classic packaging and it failed, wondering if there is something missing in the instructions ``` local: Data failed to compile: ---------- Pillar failed to...

Also from a salt-master ``` root@Unknown:/srv/pillar# salt td11 pillar.items td11: ---------- _errors: - Specified SLS 'defaults' in environment 'base' is not available on the salt master root@Unknown:/srv/pillar#``` The salt-master ```...