Dario Martins Silva
Dario Martins Silva
I made a mistake and there's actually 124 module entries per iteration :| That could explain the slowdown? I have confirmed that the target is NOT restarting every iteration, so...
`fuzzer.exe -resume -in - -out out -t 500 -instrument_module harness.exe -instrument_module module1.dll -target_module harness.exe -target_method fuzz -nargs 1 -iterations 10000 -persist -loop -- harness.exe @@`
Still want me to run litecov?
When running litecov, I get a bunch of "Target function returned normally". Here is the output when I set the number of iterations to a 100. `litecov.exe -instrument_module harness.exe -instrument_module...
I see a big difference when running with litecov. I am testing with 10 000 iterations for both the fuzzer and litecov. I get 870 executions per second with litecov....
Looking at the jackalope logs, it seems that it doesn't always complete the expected number of iterations. When configuring it to 1000 iterations, I rarely see it do as much....
Ok I will try with clean_target_on_coverage=0. Yes I am getting a different number of module entries when fuzzing. While fuzzing, that number is not constant. When fuzzing with winafl, I...
With clean_target_on_coverage=0, I always get a 1000 iterations before a process exit so things seem fine on that front.
Here's the output from a run with clean_target_on_coverage=0 Pretty fast at the beginning but then the speed lowers ``` Fuzzer version 1.00 Fuzzing sample 00006 Warning: Warning: Warning: Instrumented module...
When resuming a session, does jackalope need to re-run all the samples first?