David M. Lary
David M. Lary
> I'm not a fan of the extra branch and added parameter to Schedule::run. It's complexity that anyone that wants to make a new executor type has to handle. Is...
> Yeah, I think that adding this to a feature flag is the way: this is complexity and a performance cost that I don't want to ship in a final...
@cart i know you’ve got a lot on your plate, but could you do a quick review of this PR when you get a moment? I’d like to get it...
I'm working through the merge with master to handle the `ScheduleLabel` changes for #8436 and #9600 (zomg, someone else added label to schedule!!!), but I just found #7762 (interned labels)...
I'd honestly say try to get #7762 in, as if this goes in before it, they'll have to modify stepping for the new labels. I feel like it'll easier for...
Updated for `InternedScheduleLabel` changes.
> I's not entirely clear to me what parts of the example are the necessary components for using stepping, and which parts are for the example stepping interface. You have...
I am working on the command-line example, but the input parsing is proving to be difficult. Converting from `&str` into `impl IntoSystem` has been my primary headache. I even tried...
Hah, well I'm probably a good person to be doing cli programming as it's where I'm most comfortable. I think your comment still has merit; the existing example of `Stepping`...
Ok, added a more straightforward example using the Stepping resource. It's incredibly wordy, but exercises the resource directly in what I hope is a clear manner. There's gonna be a...