dmjio

cc @zudov 😄

Hello @Mikolaj 👋🏼 😄 Regarding the [Haskell ArrayFire](https://github.com/arrayfire/arrayfire-haskell) bindings, since reading your comment I've updated the bindings to support the latest `arrayfire` version `3.8.2`, and have tested them with `GHC...

> BTW, do you happen to know why the underlying data container in Haskell ArrayFire is an abstract pointer, instead of Storable Vector (with a primitive Haskell Storable array under...

> It seems ArrayFire does just that, though probably not with MLIR (it predates MLIR?) I believe this to be true. > Given that GHC support for such plugins is...

Just a slight note on the array construction within ArrayFire. The `.Data` module should contain some ways to construct an `Array` natively on the GPU (bypassing the Haskell heap). These...

Yes, I think it would be nice to have the concurrency portion of the GHC RTS made a library (similar to what OCaml has with `lwt`), so it could be...

To follow up on this, @csabahruska has done some work on disentangling the RTS (has scheduler and concurrency primitives implemented (`STM`, `MutVar`, etc) - most GHC tests are passing) in...

Thanks for the quick response. I'm not really sure what a builder for a schema-abiding `Value` would look like either. But one idea could be something like ... Given this...

Thanks for doing this, in order to ensure it works we'll need to update miso's nix scripts to use the new ghcjs. @stepcut has pointed out that `nix-shell -p 'pkgsCross.ghcjs.haskell.packages.ghcHEAD.ghcWithPackages...

@alexfmpe @sevanspowell ```diff - import GHCJS.Foreign.Callback + import GHC.JS.Foreign.Callback ``` Will break GHCJS builds, at the very least we should use CPP to make this a backwards compatible change. Same...