Daniel Mikusa

>In client, written with Reactor, there is a fine segregation between v2 and v3 implementations. But with cloudfoundry-operations, I am unable to find the same. Correct, there is no separation...

I don't really have a preference for approach 1 or 2. Each has some pros and cons, I'm not sure there's a clear "better" option. Given that there is a...

Yes, I think that would be an advantage of this approach. We can slowly upgrade the library and users will just get the benefit of switching to v3 without requiring...

See if this works, I apologize for the formatting. It's hard to get a thread out of Slack and have it look reasonable. [Untitled.pdf](https://github.com/paketo-buildpacks/java/files/10095102/Untitled.pdf)

Where did you build it and where are you trying to run it? What are the architectures of those machines? You can set the `BP_NATIVE_IMAGE_BUILD_ARGUMENTS` env variable for `pack build`...

+1 for this. I haven't tried it, but I think you can use a ConfigMap instead of a secret with a binding. The binding just has to be mapped into...

I don't think they are duplicates. #206 is a problem that occurs when you have an intended executable JAR but then one of the dependencies of that executable JAR is...

Seems totally reasonable, tagged as an enhancement.

@suyash-sap Hi, I believe that the integration tests require admin access as they need to exercise all facets of the API, some of which require admin access. At any rate,...

Yes, you get that error because some of the actions that are run during the integration test require admin client permissions. I believe that the admin client is going to...