Martin

Any package, that has files in a `noextract` location, that was installed after the introduction of the `noextract` location. Packages installed before adding `noextract` locations, will not produce the ERRORs,...

> Not sure if the extra work is worth it, we could just ignore ENOENT for removing files anyways. Sure, that works for me. In reality, it probably matches what...

Lurking around I found this issue, and I remembered I have a patch for that https://github.com/dmarto/xbps/commit/90d28910dc4bd49c147bc6106028192fc166ca13 My use case is the following script (that I use in combo with another...

https://github.com/void-linux/xbps/pull/430 not initially intended to do that, solves the issues reported here. Mainly, introduces checks for compatibility with REPO`-R` mode, enforces no-conflicts in MODE flags and tries to improve the...

About -R and -m, there is no scenario in which they should be used together. As -m will just drop all remote pkgs that are not installed and marked manual,...

I have pushed an update for the documentation, I decide to leave the usage message mostly as it is, and here is a compiled version of the changes to the...

I have tried to separate the changes, as best as I can; I may have gone a bit overboard on the guards and checks for the conflicting options. @Chocimier should...

I have pushed a fast update, that fixes the typos and other similar things; for the other comments, I will push and update later this week, as I currently have...

Sorry for my absence, but now that I am back, is there still interest in this PR? Should I complete the changes? Edit: either way, I pushed the requested changes,...

force-pushed an update, that fixes the conflict with the latest manpage update