Dustin Lundquist

Results 59 comments of Dustin Lundquist

Are you trying to use SNIproxy as a SOCKS proxy? It doesn’t support the SOCKS protocol. > On Mar 17, 2020, at 10:37, bartoszx wrote: > >  > Hello...

No, there is not support for accepting connections with the proxy protocol header.

@JustMe0815 sniproxy doesn't support SOCKS. Taking a quick look at the protocol, it looks like it would be possible to insert SOCKS client replacing `resolve_server_address()` and `initiate_server_connect()`. This doesn't fit...

Config syntax looks good. Note, there shouldn't be a reason why both listeners can't share a single table. I wonder how the existing listener, connection and buffer modules will work...

It looks like UDP does a four-tuple lookup for the socket: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/net/ipv4/udp.c#L2331

@aniapte I just commented on your commit above. Fundamentally I think modification of the protocol is outside of the scope of SNIProxy since it doesn't track the state of the...

@aniapte That's what I get for trying to respond before coffee... So if I understand you correctly, you want to leverage the DNS resolver functionality using a different hostname than...

@clodez The current transparent mode support uses the Linux specific IP_TRANSPARENT option. This is not present it FreeBSD, but there is a similar IP_BINDANY option. I'm not sure how much...

@clodez I'm a bit taken aback by your tone. I realize English might not be your native language and you don't realize how you come across. I'm not a regular...