Devis Lucato
Devis Lucato
no problem about making it configurable if it helps. If I remember correctly Azure Queues uses a count to decide when to discard a message, while RabbitMQ uses an expiration...
@rborosak for which model and/or tokenizer?
I'll see if there's an easy approach, not too expensive to develop. Can't promise though. We always welcome PRs, or draft PRs to kickstart the process if that might help.
> @dluc I have made a PR to set the missing properties in RabbitMQ: #454. > > After that, I think that also in `RabbitMQPipeline` we should handle a max...
> KernelMemory should drop the AskAsync functionality, being "just" a Memory plugin (SearchAsync) for SK + all the Indexing capabilities... (don't kill me, just thinking out loud 😄 ) it's...
> So, do you prefer using such solutions instead of the quorum queue? quorum queues don't seem to offer a delayed delivery, do they? When a message delivery fails we...
> yeah, don't get me wrong, I love KM and we're using it in PROD (would be interesting for a case-study??). That said, the AskAsync method offers less possibilities than...
Please feel free to use https://github.com/microsoft/kernel-memory/discussions/532 to vote for this feature
hey @marcominerva that would be nice, if possible. It might be a lot of work considering the extra queues to introduce - so, before starting, do you think we could...
> Yes. I can start, for example, creating the extra queues and then making a draft PR, so you can see the work in progress. Do you agree? yes please...