Daniel Spiewak
Daniel Spiewak
> Anyways, I might tackle this once we're done with axes (hopefully, during the weekend I'll have time to add the methods we discussed). Awesome!
> I do wonder if there's a better name than `PathFunction`, though. That made sense to me when it returned a list of paths, but seems awkward if it takes...
Wow, I'm really on the ball here… Taking a look now, should have some feedback tonight.
And just because I'm a horrible person, I didn't take care of this last week. I have now though! Everything looks good. I do think you're right though that the...
> I still have reservations about the readability of the whole thing, feels like the Zipper is being spread too thin between the numerous traits. That is the downside, to...
So, this is one of those areas where we're consciously compromising in order to get a more usable functional tree. I believe @jespersm raised these same points. Theoretically speaking, this...
> It doesn't really allow for upper-level nodes to change the meaning of the children's namespace mappings, that must be done by rewriting the tree. Right, so one way or...
This is definitely an annoying parse issue, which we should fix. I'm not yet sure about the other changes though. Will comment on issue #78.
I think this is absolutely a good idea. I put some thought into this a while ago, but I didn't act on it because, frankly, it's such a mess to...
I haven't started on it yet (haven't found the time). It's definitely an important item though; thanks for tackling it!