fast-socks5
fast-socks5 copied to clipboard
dizda
Benchmarks (fast-socks5 vs hev-socks5-server)
It's great to see more projects in Rust, I also like Rust. I wrote a socks5 server in C, and just out of curiosity, I compared their performance. (fast-socks5 vs hev-socks5-server)
The hardware is an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor, bandwidth was measured using iperf3, and the iperf3 client was proxied through socks5 using proxychains-ng.
# hev-socks5-server
bin/hev-socks5-server conf/main.yml # workers: 32
# fast-socks5
cargo run -r --example server -- --listen-addr 127.0.0.1:1080 no-auth
# iperf3 server
iperf3 -s
# download (1-thread)
proxychains iperf3 -c 127.0.0.1 -R
# download (10-thread)
proxychains iperf3 -c 127.0.0.1 -R -P 10
# upload (1-thread)
proxychains iperf3 -c 127.0.0.1
# upload (10-thread)
proxychains iperf3 -c 127.0.0.1 -P 10
The test focused on transfer speed, CPU usage and memory usage.
| hev-socks5-server | Speed (Gbits/s) | CPU usage (%) | Memory usage (MB) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Download (1-thread) | 46.7 | 54 | 1.8 |
| Download (10-thread) | 274 | 380 | 1.8 |
| Upload (1-thread) | 46.7 | 54 | 1.8 |
| Upload (10-thread) | 288 | 430 | 1.8 |
| fast-socks5 | Speed (Gbits/s) | CPU usage (%) | Memory usage (MB) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Download (1-thread) | 38.7 | 92 | 3.2 |
| Download (10-thread) | 121 | 858 | 3.5 |
| Upload (1-thread) | 28.9 | 64 | 3.2 |
| Upload (10-thread) | 128 | 882 | 3.5 |
Hey @heiher
Thank you for posting this comparison. I've developed this library a while ago, and I think a lot of it can now be improved, especially on the UX dev side.
