tsconfig-paths
tsconfig-paths copied to clipboard
tsconfig-paths doesn't work with node (works with ts-node)
$ node -r tsconfig-paths/register dist/index.js
module.js:550
throw err;
^
Error: Cannot find module '@modules/webhooks'
at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:548:15)
at Function.Module._resolveFilename (/home/niko/WebstormProjects/guild-review/node_modules/tsconfig-paths/lib/register.js:73:40)
at Function.Module._load (module.js:475:25)
at Module.require (module.js:597:17)
at require (internal/module.js:11:18)
at Object.<anonymous> (/home/niko/WebstormProjects/guild-review/server/dist/index.js:5:20)
at Module._compile (module.js:653:30)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:664:10)
at Module.load (module.js:566:32)
at tryModuleLoad (module.js:506:12)
Repro: https://github.com/darkbasic/guild-review
yarn && yarn workspace server build && cd server && node -r tsconfig-paths/register dist/index.js
I have the same problem. I also tried to put tsconfig.json file under dist but didn't help.
As a workaround, you can do node -r ts-node/register -r tsconfig-paths/register dist/index.js
.
@kel-sakal-biyik @darkbasic
@darkbasic I moved a tsconfig.json file under dist folder with only path configuration and run the index.js under dist folder. By doing so it read the tsconfig file under the dist folder and it worked. You can give it a try, it might help you too.
Yep just tried it not working with node, and @dotansimha solution I believe it's not optimal for production environment.
@bushybuffalo reported a fix here. I couldn't get it to work with my project but our configuration is more complicated than the example. I went with @kel-sakal-biyik's solution for now.
So I end up using the following:
"start": "node -r ts-node/register/transpile-only -r tsconfig-paths/register dist/main.js"
Hope it doesn't have any negative impact.
So I end up using the following:
"start": "node -r ts-node/register/transpile-only -r tsconfig-paths/register dist/main.js"
Hope it doesn't have any negative impact.
Right, but the particularity about this temporary workaround is that I need to move ts-node
to dependencies
section. For example to deploy my app into a Docker container.
Ideal solution (again) would be just run the transpiled code:
{
"prod": "node -r tsconfig-paths/register dist/main.js"
}
May I ask for an update on this issue?
+1
I have created a persistent Typescript paths replacer for those wants to replace TS path aliases directly. No runtime replace.
@chanlito Tried your solution, but I'm having the following error message.
EntityMetadataNotFound: No metadata for "SomeEntityClass" was found.
Any ideas?
@jeffminsungkim are you using reflect-metadata
? did you import or require it?
With node node -r tsconfig-paths/register main.js
So this bit from the README should be removed to avoid confusion
@chanlito I believe that the Nest.js framework uses reflect-metadata
. So my answer is yes.
I managed to make it work by using the TS_NODE_PROJECT
env variable to point to a tweaked tsconfig file. In practice this means:
Launch script
TS_NODE_PROJECT=tsconfig.prod.json node -r tsconfig-paths/register dist/index.js
tsconfig.prod.json
{
"extends": "./tsconfig.js",
"compilerOptions": {
"baseUrl": "dist"
}
}
For some reason I could not override the compilerOptions.paths
to rewrite them from the new baseUrl
, but this particular setup seems OK.
Running into this issue as well. Seems like the common solution requires changing the baseUrl
value so it'll work in prod. See #114
So the issue is, that the baseUrl
will be resolved relative to tsconfig.json
in root of your project, but in reality, it should point to your dist
folder (or wherever your compiled files are). This package is working fine and it's not actually a bug, but I think adding something like TS_PATHS_ROOT
environment variable, that would allow people to override the root of baseUrl
would be much appreciated (actually there's already a PR for that - https://github.com/dividab/tsconfig-paths/pull/114)
So the node.js is trying to load your actual typescript source files. Using the -r ts-node/register/transpile-only
workaround basically means you will compile your typescript files twice because you'll be importing the typescript files (that use the paths) not the compiled javascript. It's almost the same as running ts-node on your uncompiled index file.
One possible solution is to copy tsconfig.json
to your dist
path and set the current working directory (CWD) to said dist path when running the file. You have to set the CWD to dist
because the tsconfig.json
in CWD has the highest priority.
Another possible solution (and probably much cleaner) is to use mentioned https://github.com/ilearnio/module-alias, just keep in mind you have to point to your dist
folder.
Example
Project structure
tsconfig.json - original tsconfig
src/index.ts - your sources
dist/index.js - tsc output
dist/tsconfig.json - tsconfig copy next to the index.js
then you can use vscode to debug run with following config:
{
"type": "node",
"request": "launch",
"name": "Launch Program",
"skipFiles": [
"<node_internals>/**"
],
"cwd": "${workspaceFolder}/dist/",
"runtimeArgs": ["-r", "tsconfig-paths/register"],
"program": "${workspaceFolder}\\dist\\src\\index.js",
"outFiles": [
"${workspaceFolder}/dist/**/*.js"
]
}
@ejhayes sorry, but can you explain what you mean by that?
I'm usually specifying '.' as the baseUrl and then I get the explained error. Right now, I'm sticking with the workaround from above (https://github.com/dividab/tsconfig-paths/issues/61#issuecomment-443481737)
For me all of the above didn't work. Also had to use json5, cause have comments in tsconfig.json. The solution from this post worked: https://github.com/nestjs/nest/issues/986#issuecomment-509295864
my "./tsconfig"
"outDir": "./dist",
"./tsconfig-paths-bootstrap.js" (also in the root of the project)
const json5 = require("json5");
const fs = require("fs");
const tsConfigPaths = require("tsconfig-paths");
const tsConfigPath = "./tsconfig.json";
const data = fs.readFileSync(tsConfigPath);
const tsConfig = json5.parse(data);
const paths = tsConfig.compilerOptions.paths;
tsConfigPaths.register({
baseUrl: tsConfig.compilerOptions.outDir,
paths: Object.keys(paths).reduce(
(agg, key) => ({
...agg,
[key]: paths[key].map(p =>
p.replace(tsConfig.compilerOptions.baseUrl, tsConfig.compilerOptions.outDir),
),
}),
{},
),
});
Solution above didn't work after deployment (probably more variables involved in building Docker image and environment variables etc.) So tried with similar to https://github.com/dividab/tsconfig-paths/issues/61#issuecomment-513642851 to actually have proper imports in the resulting *.js in "/dist" folder. But eventually ended with "module-alias" https://www.npmjs.com/package/module-alias as it is easy to use and just works.
I ended up going with a modified solution based on @mkalam-alami's approach. The issue is that the tsconfig.json
at the top level sets a baseUrl
that makes sense for the top level but not the compiled js in your dist/
or build/
. My work around was just to copy the top level tsconfig.json
into the tsc
output dir and use that for the TS_NODE_PROJECT
variable. That way you preserve your defaults without any custom files, and because you moved the file to that directory, you change the relative position of your baseUrl
so that it again makes sense to the rest of the files you're executing. Example package.json below contrasting dev vs prod runs
"scripts": {
"build": "tsc && cp ./tsconfig.json ./build/",
"start": "ts-node-dev -r tsconfig-paths/register src/index.ts",
"start:production": "npm run build && TS_NODE_PROJECT=build/tsconfig.json node -r tsconfig-paths/register ./build/src/index.js",
}
Thanks, @TSiege. Your solution is awesome.
FYI. Considering the tsconfig.json at the paths
section. If you define those absolute paths be like this
"paths": {
"@/*": ["./src/*"]
}
you should set the outDir
to be like "./dist/src" as well.
Instead of
node ./dist/entry.js
use:
NODE_PATH=./dist node ./dist/entry.js
inspiration from: https://youtu.be/QVxxgEyZt9Y (TDD With TypeScript, Express, NodeJS, and Mocha Unit Tests)
TS_NODE_PROJECT=build/tsconfig.json
@TSiege Your solution is the more elegant solution while PR #114 is approved. It's works for me. This is my full config...
tsconfig.json
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "es5",
"module": "commonjs",
"outDir": "./dist",
"rootDir": "./",
"moduleResolution": "node",
"baseUrl": ".",
"paths": {
"@server/*": ["./src/server/*"],
"@globals/*": ["./src/globals/*"],
"@plugins/*": ["./src/plugins/*"],
"@modules/*": ["./src/modules/*"]
},
"esModuleInterop": true,
"resolveJsonModule": true,
},
"exclude": ["node_modules", "dist", "tests"],
"ts-node": {
"require": ["tsconfig-paths/register"]
}
}
Scripts on package.json. It's going to build then run build
Windows user, remember using copy instead of cp command with \\
and not /
{
...,
"scripts": {
"dev": "cross-env NODE_ENV=dev nodemon --exec ts-node ./src/server/app.ts",
"build": "tsc && cp ./tsconfig.json ./dist/",
"build:windows": "tsc && copy .\\tsconfig.json .\\dist\\",
"start": "npm run build && cross-env TS_NODE_PROJECT=dist/tsconfig.json NODE_ENV=production node -r tsconfig-paths/register ./dist/src/server/app.js",
"start:windows": "npm run build:windows && cross-env TS_NODE_PROJECT=dist/tsconfig.json NODE_ENV=production node -r tsconfig-paths/register ./dist/src/server/app.js"
}
}
All above may be not elegant or convenient, I won't use these solutions because ROI is too low
As a workaround, you can do
node -r ts-node/register -r tsconfig-paths/register dist/index.js
. @kel-sakal-biyik @darkbasic
This solved my problem
You can now specify TS_NODE_BASEURL
thanks to https://github.com/dividab/tsconfig-paths/pull/185 as follows:
TS_NODE_BASEURL=./dist node -r tsconfig-paths/register main.js
Hi all,
In my case, if I deleted the src
folder, the issue related to alias path happens. Here is my folder structure
tsconfig.json
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "es5",
"lib": ["ES2015", "DOM"],
"paths": {
"@models/*": ["src/models/*"],
"@controllers/*": ["src/controllers/*"],
"@routes/*": ["src/routes/*"],
"@views/*": ["src/views/*"],
"@utils/*": ["src/utils/*"],
"@app_type": ["typing/app.type.ts"],
"@config/*": ["config/*"],
"@fixture": ["fixtureData/fixture.ts"],
"@tests/*": ["tests/*"]
},
"module": "commonjs",
"baseUrl": ".",
"esModuleInterop": true,
"noEmitOnError": true,
"resolveJsonModule": true,
"forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true,
"strict": true,
"skipLibCheck": true,
"typeRoots": ["typing", "./node_modules/@types"],
"rootDirs": ["./src", "./config"],
"outDir": "./dist",
"sourceMap": true
},
"exclude": ["node_modules", "build_script.ts"]
}
scripts in package.json
"clean": "npx rimraf ./dist/",
"prebuild": "npm run clean",
"build": "npx tsc -p . && npm run build:js",
"postbuild": "npx ts-node ./build_script.ts",
"format": "prettier --write ./src/**/*.ts ./tests/**/*.ts",
"start": "npx cross-env NODE_ENV=production node -r ts-node/register/transpile-only -r tsconfig-paths/register ./dist/src/server.js",
I would like to know is there a way (even work-around) to fix this issue.
After some confusion with a lot of approaches to fix. I was able to fix the issue just using the env var suggested in the documentation. I hope that will help others with the same problem. I believe this is not an issue anymore.
My tsconfig.json:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"outDir": "./built",
"allowJs": true,
"target": "es6",
"moduleResolution": "Node",
"module": "CommonJS",
"esModuleInterop": true,
"emitDecoratorMetadata": true,
"experimentalDecorators": true,
"resolveJsonModule": true,
"baseUrl": "./src",
"paths": {
"@config/*": ["./config/*"],
"@controllers/*": ["./controllers/*"],
"@models/*": ["./models/*"],
"@repositories/*": ["./repositories/*"],
"@services/*": ["./services/*"],
"@tests/*": ["../tests/*"]
}
},
"include": ["./src/**/*"]
}
My script to start the server:
"start": "tsc && TS_NODE_BASEURL=./built node -r tsconfig-paths/register ./built/app.js",
Current versions are:
- Node: 16
- tsconfig-paths: "^4.1.0",
- typescript: "^4.7.4"
In case someone wanna confirm, that's the source code: https://github.com/rogeraraujo90/hey-freela
So no solution for this yet basically, only workarounds for now ?
- I wouldn't want to
compile
again when runningstart
after already doing it when building